Skip to main content

Mentoring a new QA

I've recently been asked to help devise a mentoring plan for a new QA associate. I sat down and thought about it, and thought it would make a half decent blog post, so here goes!

In order to come up with a plan, I needed to identify key areas of QA that as a new QA I would appreciate. I came up with the below areas that I feel would benefit most new QA members:

- Automation
Selenium IDE moving onto Selenium WebDriver perhaps
SoapUI Pro
Obviously these will be domain specific, so if you're using QTP for automation, then obviously try mentoring in that etc... In fact this can be applied to much of the below.
- SQL
- C#/Programming Language
- Writing Manual Test Cases
- Exploratory Testing
- Writing Bug Reports
- Testing Tools
Fiddler
Browser AddOns
Test Case Management/Defect Management (Be it Microsoft Test Manager, Quality Center etc)
-Performance Testing
-Cross Site Scripting/Security Testing
-Breaking down a PBI 
COAs
GWTs
- Release testing
- Involved in a release sprint
- Regression testing
- Sprint Planning/Retrospective

It's also important to ask the new QA what they want to do, do they want to become a specialist in Test Automation, in which case it would be very Automation orientated, or if they were interested in management, then the plan might look slightly different to the above. 

So that's enough of what I feel would be useful to go through, however, actually going through the above would be time consuming without a thought out plan. 

Ideally the mentee would cover as much as possible within their day to day work, so they would work on a sprint as there is no substitute for applying theory to actual work when it comes to learning, they would decompose PBIs, they would get involved with regression and release testing, do some automation with another QA/Developer, write their own bug reports... The important thing is that there is regular contact with their mentor over the work they are doing, they can bounce any ideas off the mentor, and the mentor might even benefit from some fresh ideas from the mentee.

Eventually the mentor will hopefully become like a buddy for that person, and the regular meetings can be scrapped and irregular catch-ups can be done ad hoc, and the mentee will pass on their knowledge and become the mentor in the future, but knowing that if they come across any issues their buddy/mentor will be available to them.

I think the success of a mentoring program comes from the mentee being willing to learn and the mentor being experienced, open and care about the mentee's progress. 

I'm yet to really see a successful mentoring program, as I believe it requires a lot of dedication and it isn't going to happen overnight, when a mentoring program is first put in place, it's not going to be perfect from the off, it will need tweaking, but hopefully it will bring benefits to the company at some point in the not too distant future. So long as the person has a point of contact for anything they may need, then I would regard that as a positive outcome for the mentee and the entire QA team.

Comments

  1. This was good timing - I'm mentoring a person that is really new to the world of QA and wants to get into the field. This is quite invaluable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awesome! I'm pleased it's come in useful for someone other than myself!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Testers: Be more like a Super-Villain!

Who doesn't love a Super Hero? Talk to my son, and he'll tell you how much he loves them, talk to many adults and they'll say the same! Deep down, we all love to be the Super Hero, we all want to save the day! However, I want to talk about the flip side of Super Heroes, the Super Villains... I often play Imaginext with my son, and I (unfortunately?) am nearly always the Super Villain! Be it Lex Luthor, Joker, Two Face, Mr Freeze or The Riddler! These are all great characters and great Super Villains, but why would I want to write about Super Villains? A while ago where I worked, we had a few Super Heroes, people who would be able to come in and "fix" things that had broken and help deliver projects on time. We then shifted, we decided to do away with the Super Hero culture and try and prevent from being in that position in the first place, whilst we didn't go as far as wanting to hire Super Villains, it's definitely a story that has stuck with me and t...

Value in QA Courses/Qualifications?

I have in the past questioned the value in getting certifications/going on courses for the sake of getting a certificate in testing. Whilst I do still question the worth of such an issue, I have recently read some articles which has shown me there is more value in these courses/certificates than I previously gave them credit for. The main positive that I can think of, upon completing a course like an ISEB Foundation, is that it ensures that testers are on the same page when it comes to communicating. A bug is a bug, or if I'm speaking to someone about Integration testing, they know exactly what I am talking about and won't get confused. I think in ensuring that everybody is on the same page when it comes to discussing testing issues/testing activities, it helps in gaining respect and confidence from other teams and other team members, as we are all singing from the same hymn sheet.  It isn't just about communication in the term of words however, it is impor...

Measuring QA Key Skills and Competencies

I have been thinking about how I can help encourage self improvement within my team, as I understand it, everyone wants to improve, it's just that often there are a number of things that hold people back. I believe one of these things that hold people back are around identifying skills that they are perhaps weak in or that they could/should improve on. So I thought about how I can help tackle that problem. One solution that I want to try with people is to identify the key skills for a QA, what key skills should every QA have, or at least what key skills make up a good QA? If I can identify these then I can start helping people identify if they are lacking in an area. Sure there is a competency matrix that we have, but it has things like "An excellent understanding of XXX", it's often very difficult to quantify what an excellent understanding actually is. So I sat down and came up with the following key skills: OOP Test Documentation Manual Testing Automated...