Skip to main content

How to get into QA?


I've had people ask me in the past that they are trying to get into QA, but don't really know how, so I thought I'd write a quick post on what I would do if I wanted to get into QA now...

 This post is going to slightly contradict my previous post, in that I recommend at least getting qualified, I would recommend ISEB Foundation qualification, whilst in that post I argued against the qualification route... 

 However, let me explain myself a little, the ISEB qualification, rightly or wrongly, is required by a lot of employers who wish to get into QA, and whilst it does teach you the basics, being a QA is a lot more than that. It's about having a passion for it, about having the correct skills and technical knowledge. So whilst I do recommend the ISEB qualification, this is only the start of things.

One thing that employers love, and rightly so, is passion. A passion to be the best in your field, a passion to find bugs and break things definitely helps. But how can you do this when you haven't got a job/piece of software to test? This is where the world wide Web can come into play, theres billions of websites that you can test, be it manually or automated and let the company know of the results. This can be a fruitless task, but it shows a passion and desire to do well in the field. 

The correct skillet is essential, but what exactly is the correct skillet, now obviously you don't have to have them all, as none of us are perfect... However here are just some of the skills I look for:
- Curiosity: a curiosity and ability to think outside of the box is helpful when writing tests or even when performing exploratory testing. 

- Investigatory skills: important when logging a bug or having to think of what needs to be tested and how

- Observational skills: the ability to observe is essential, how are you going to write a description of a bug if you don't pay attention? Then there's the ability to see the bigger picture, are there any systems downstream affected by this change? 

 - Strong Conversational skills: you as a QA need to be able to articulate what the problem is to anyone who will listen, you need to explain what is happening and if possible why.

 - Persuasiveness: How will you persuade a developer that the bug you've found is a P1 bug and not a P3 bug as they initially think? You need to be able to persuade them, or at least come to some compromise.

This next attribute, is that of technical skills (I'll be publishing a post that goes into this in more detail). What technical skills you need will vary much on the toolset and languages used by the company, but if you think something might be useful then learn it in your own. This shows the passion you will need to succeed in your everyday life in your job. Some of the technical skills that I have and use in my current job are C#, SQL, vbscript and SoapUI. As I said these are useful in my job currently, but if I were to move then I'm sure that I'd have to learn a whole new skill set, but that's all part of the challenge. However, it's important to at least have some technical skills when applying for any job.

Obviously, there is also a need to document this all, you should do this not just in a CV (but definitely get that up to scratch), but think about writing a blog too about everything you do, not only will it show what you are learning to the world, but it will help you remember what you have learnt and it may teach someone something. 

Finally, and possibly one of the most important ones, is networking. Follow people on twitter, get involved in QA professionals blogs (be it reading and writing), read some books about testing to give you a better view of what actually is involved and get to testing meet ups to meet new people, you never know you may just meet your future employer there! It might also help to get a mentor, someone who can guide you or help you in your quest to getting into QA!

 Oh and lets not forget, you probably need to apply for jobs! Some useful websites for jobs are Monster, CW Jobs and JobSite :)
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coding something simple.... or not! Taking a screenshot on error using Selenium WebDriver

I recently wrote a little function that takes a screenshot at the end of a test if it has errored. What sounded very simple at the start turned out to be quite a bit of work, and quite a few lines of code to handle certain scenarios! It's now over 50 lines of code! I'll start with what I had at the beginning, this was to simply take a screenshot in the working directory, we are using SpecFlow and Selenium to run the tests, so we are going to check if the ScenarioContext.Current.TestError isn't null, if it is, then using Selenium, take a screenshot (note the below code is a simplified version of what I had at the beginning). [AfterScenario]         public static void TakeScreenShotOnError()         {             if (ScenarioContext.Current.TestError == null) return;             var screenshotDriver = Driver as ITakesScreenshot;             if (screenshotD...
15 comments
Read more

How to manage resources within new teams?

Working where I work we are constantly spinning up new teams to take on new workloads as business come up with new demands and new features they want developed and tested. The problem with this is how do we ensure the work of the newly spun up team is of sufficient quality. One method is by taking people from other established teams and placing them on the new team. This works great for the new team, but unfortunately it will oftenl eave the established team lacking in a resource whilst they try and fill the gap left by the person who has left. We are seeing this often with our offshore teams, it can be damaging to the team structure and the teams velocity, but try as I might, I can't think of another way around it. It's far easier to take 1 person from a team that is established than it is to build a whole new team from scratch. At least by leaving the core of a team in place, you should be guaranteeing that the new team are aware of any coding standards or any QA standard...
Post a Comment
Read more

Considerations when creating automated tests

We recently released to a number of teams our automated regression pack that has been worked on over the past few months. This regression pack tests legacy code, but contains a large number of tests.  As a bit of background, a number of teams are working on new solutions whilst some are still working on legacy code. With this in mind we constructed an email with a list of guidelines when creating new tests that need to be added to this regression pack.  I figured that these can be quite broad so should apply for any organisation, so thought it would make an interesting blog post...  So here goes,  when creating automated tests, it's important to consider and adhere to the following: - Think about data . The tests need to retrieve or set the data they need without any manual intervention - This should help them be more robust and easier to run without manual intervention. - The tests need to be idempotent - By making it so that each test is standalone and does...
Post a Comment
Read more