Skip to main content

Mentoring a new QA

I've recently been asked to help devise a mentoring plan for a new QA associate. I sat down and thought about it, and thought it would make a half decent blog post, so here goes!

In order to come up with a plan, I needed to identify key areas of QA that as a new QA I would appreciate. I came up with the below areas that I feel would benefit most new QA members:

- Automation
Selenium IDE moving onto Selenium WebDriver perhaps
SoapUI Pro
Obviously these will be domain specific, so if you're using QTP for automation, then obviously try mentoring in that etc... In fact this can be applied to much of the below.
- SQL
- C#/Programming Language
- Writing Manual Test Cases
- Exploratory Testing
- Writing Bug Reports
- Testing Tools
Fiddler
Browser AddOns
Test Case Management/Defect Management (Be it Microsoft Test Manager, Quality Center etc)
-Performance Testing
-Cross Site Scripting/Security Testing
-Breaking down a PBI 
COAs
GWTs
- Release testing
- Involved in a release sprint
- Regression testing
- Sprint Planning/Retrospective

It's also important to ask the new QA what they want to do, do they want to become a specialist in Test Automation, in which case it would be very Automation orientated, or if they were interested in management, then the plan might look slightly different to the above. 

So that's enough of what I feel would be useful to go through, however, actually going through the above would be time consuming without a thought out plan. 

Ideally the mentee would cover as much as possible within their day to day work, so they would work on a sprint as there is no substitute for applying theory to actual work when it comes to learning, they would decompose PBIs, they would get involved with regression and release testing, do some automation with another QA/Developer, write their own bug reports... The important thing is that there is regular contact with their mentor over the work they are doing, they can bounce any ideas off the mentor, and the mentor might even benefit from some fresh ideas from the mentee.

Eventually the mentor will hopefully become like a buddy for that person, and the regular meetings can be scrapped and irregular catch-ups can be done ad hoc, and the mentee will pass on their knowledge and become the mentor in the future, but knowing that if they come across any issues their buddy/mentor will be available to them.

I think the success of a mentoring program comes from the mentee being willing to learn and the mentor being experienced, open and care about the mentee's progress. 

I'm yet to really see a successful mentoring program, as I believe it requires a lot of dedication and it isn't going to happen overnight, when a mentoring program is first put in place, it's not going to be perfect from the off, it will need tweaking, but hopefully it will bring benefits to the company at some point in the not too distant future. So long as the person has a point of contact for anything they may need, then I would regard that as a positive outcome for the mentee and the entire QA team.

Comments

  1. This was good timing - I'm mentoring a person that is really new to the world of QA and wants to get into the field. This is quite invaluable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awesome! I'm pleased it's come in useful for someone other than myself!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coding something simple.... or not! Taking a screenshot on error using Selenium WebDriver

I recently wrote a little function that takes a screenshot at the end of a test if it has errored. What sounded very simple at the start turned out to be quite a bit of work, and quite a few lines of code to handle certain scenarios! It's now over 50 lines of code! I'll start with what I had at the beginning, this was to simply take a screenshot in the working directory, we are using SpecFlow and Selenium to run the tests, so we are going to check if the ScenarioContext.Current.TestError isn't null, if it is, then using Selenium, take a screenshot (note the below code is a simplified version of what I had at the beginning). [AfterScenario]         public static void TakeScreenShotOnError()         {             if (ScenarioContext.Current.TestError == null) return;             var screenshotDriver = Driver as ITakesScreenshot;             if (screenshotD...

How to manage resources within new teams?

Working where I work we are constantly spinning up new teams to take on new workloads as business come up with new demands and new features they want developed and tested. The problem with this is how do we ensure the work of the newly spun up team is of sufficient quality. One method is by taking people from other established teams and placing them on the new team. This works great for the new team, but unfortunately it will oftenl eave the established team lacking in a resource whilst they try and fill the gap left by the person who has left. We are seeing this often with our offshore teams, it can be damaging to the team structure and the teams velocity, but try as I might, I can't think of another way around it. It's far easier to take 1 person from a team that is established than it is to build a whole new team from scratch. At least by leaving the core of a team in place, you should be guaranteeing that the new team are aware of any coding standards or any QA standard...

Considerations when creating automated tests

We recently released to a number of teams our automated regression pack that has been worked on over the past few months. This regression pack tests legacy code, but contains a large number of tests.  As a bit of background, a number of teams are working on new solutions whilst some are still working on legacy code. With this in mind we constructed an email with a list of guidelines when creating new tests that need to be added to this regression pack.  I figured that these can be quite broad so should apply for any organisation, so thought it would make an interesting blog post...  So here goes,  when creating automated tests, it's important to consider and adhere to the following: - Think about data . The tests need to retrieve or set the data they need without any manual intervention - This should help them be more robust and easier to run without manual intervention. - The tests need to be idempotent - By making it so that each test is standalone and does...