Skip to main content

Become a team player....

We've all worked as part of a team as a tester before, whether that be in an Agile team where you work directly with developers or in a QA team in a more waterfall environment, but have we ever looked at how we can improve our relationships within the team? I'm not necessarily talking about nights out, although that undoubtedly helps, I'm talking about team relationships and enhancing them as you see fit.

It's been a long time since I worked in a Waterfall environment, however, I think the same principles apply to waterfall as they do for agile when it comes to team relationships.

When working in a team, the following are key principles that I think you should follow:

  • Team first - Put the team first before any personal gain, if you are up for a promotion for instance, then don't just think about yourself, don't put your personal objectives above that of the team, this will be noticeable.
  • Communicate freely with the team - Often I've been in teams where they've been deemed a bit loud, that to me isn't a bad thing, a team that plays well and laughs together undoubtedly works well together.
  • Be honest with your team members - If you're having trouble doing some work, be honest and open about why, don't try and shy away from it, tackle the problem head on, and you never know people in the team might be able to help you overcome that team.
  • Talk about personal life - Talking about your personal life builds the trust within the team, and with trust comes respect, which will undoubtedly help the team work together.
  • Don't blame individuals - It's not any individuals fault as to why a product was released with a bug in it, people will ask the QA what was tested, and if it wasn't tested, then questions will be asked as to why, which is definitely a team question, was it a lack of communication? or was it a last minute change? It doesn't matter for the blame game, but it does matter so that you can learn from it and avoid it next time.
I read a blog recently here where she discusses the value in retrospectives, these are often invaluable in building team relationships, what is said in a retrospective should stay in a retrospective, and it's a platform for honest and constructive criticism as well as patting people on the back and saying they did a good job. Retrospectives aren't completely about actions, so long as people are honest with each other and relationships are developed, then that in my opinion is another positive for retrospectives.

So whilst that last point was agile specific, there's no reason why you can't have similar meetings in waterfall after a release, discuss (either with just QA or developers as well) what went badly, what went well etc. 

I think if an individual... no sorry, team, were to follow the above, then they would certainly all feel a part of something bigger than themselves, and it wouldhelp make work more fun, and help them work better together.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Testers: Be more like a Super-Villain!

Who doesn't love a Super Hero? Talk to my son, and he'll tell you how much he loves them, talk to many adults and they'll say the same! Deep down, we all love to be the Super Hero, we all want to save the day! However, I want to talk about the flip side of Super Heroes, the Super Villains... I often play Imaginext with my son, and I (unfortunately?) am nearly always the Super Villain! Be it Lex Luthor, Joker, Two Face, Mr Freeze or The Riddler! These are all great characters and great Super Villains, but why would I want to write about Super Villains? A while ago where I worked, we had a few Super Heroes, people who would be able to come in and "fix" things that had broken and help deliver projects on time. We then shifted, we decided to do away with the Super Hero culture and try and prevent from being in that position in the first place, whilst we didn't go as far as wanting to hire Super Villains, it's definitely a story that has stuck with me and t...

Value in QA Courses/Qualifications?

I have in the past questioned the value in getting certifications/going on courses for the sake of getting a certificate in testing. Whilst I do still question the worth of such an issue, I have recently read some articles which has shown me there is more value in these courses/certificates than I previously gave them credit for. The main positive that I can think of, upon completing a course like an ISEB Foundation, is that it ensures that testers are on the same page when it comes to communicating. A bug is a bug, or if I'm speaking to someone about Integration testing, they know exactly what I am talking about and won't get confused. I think in ensuring that everybody is on the same page when it comes to discussing testing issues/testing activities, it helps in gaining respect and confidence from other teams and other team members, as we are all singing from the same hymn sheet.  It isn't just about communication in the term of words however, it is impor...

Measuring QA Key Skills and Competencies

I have been thinking about how I can help encourage self improvement within my team, as I understand it, everyone wants to improve, it's just that often there are a number of things that hold people back. I believe one of these things that hold people back are around identifying skills that they are perhaps weak in or that they could/should improve on. So I thought about how I can help tackle that problem. One solution that I want to try with people is to identify the key skills for a QA, what key skills should every QA have, or at least what key skills make up a good QA? If I can identify these then I can start helping people identify if they are lacking in an area. Sure there is a competency matrix that we have, but it has things like "An excellent understanding of XXX", it's often very difficult to quantify what an excellent understanding actually is. So I sat down and came up with the following key skills: OOP Test Documentation Manual Testing Automated...