Skip to main content

Improve Communication between Developers and QA

Having recently read the following blog about how to improve communication from a developers perspective, I thought it would be interesting to have a QA perspective on it...

Firstly, communication is key to being a good tester. When someone speaks about the skills of a tester, one thing that I think is one of the top things to look for, is that of a good communicator, someone can have the best technical knowledge and skills in the world, but if they can't communicate what they were doing or how they found a bug, then they would not rank highly in my book.

So how can you improve communication between the QA and the developers, firstly, I don't think you should look at you all as being part of one team, delivering a quality software product, do not have an us vs them attitude, when bugs are raised late on, it's your fault as well as it is the developers fault, you are one team. There is no I in team. 

To help in this, it can work in your favour to be careful when raising bugs/defects, do not raise them in an accusatory term, do not degrade their coding skills, people make mistakes, bugs happen, just mention it to them and log it appropriately, and move on. Developers can be sensitive over their code, and rightly so, they will have worked hard on it, so to have it criticised can not hold well for team relationships.

Also, you can improve team relationships by speaking to developers about non work issues, become friendly with them and get to know them on a personal level, this just makes it easier to speak to them about anything, be it work issues or non work issues, when you are talking consistently throughout the day, you can talk to them about anything at anytime without it being uncomfortable.

Whenever you have sprint planning meetings, or any meeting in fact with the team, don't be afraid to speak up, and voice your opinion on anything, if you feel strongly about something say so, the developers will respect you more for doing so. Also, if you don't understand something, ask questions, don't shy away from technical issues, you can guarantee that if you don't understand something then chances are that someone else in the meeting wouldn't have understood it. You will learn far more by asking questions than sitting silent and not doing anything.

Finally, when we talk about communication, I've mainly mentioned face to face communication, and there's a reason for this, I much prefer speaking to people face to face than over email, as it's much more personal and will developer relationships even further than a quick email. Anyone can send an email, if you have an issue speak face to face, it's much hard to misconstrue something that is said face to face than it is over email. If you absolutely have to send an email, don't be afraid to follow it up with a face to face conversation, or even the other way round, speak to them face to face then send an email summarising what was discussed if you want to keep a record of what was said.

You can not underestimate the importance of QA and Developer relationships, you are working together to product something that is much bigger than you individually, so it makes sense to work on the relationship, and make sure it is in as best a shape as possible. Not only will it improve the quality of the product, but it will help improve your work by making it friendlier and more fun place to work.

I've included the mindmap that I created to help with this blog post... stay with me, I will write a blog soon about mindmaps!






Comments

  1. I am in love with these mind maps!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am so glad I read this. I live by this concept. It doesn't help all the time, but, I am glad to know I have been doing the 'right' thing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad it's helped you! Even if it hasn't helped all the time, the times it does help it's invaluable!

      Delete
  3. really nice article .... learnt alot from this :))

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is of utmost importance not only to communicate but also effectively communicate. Please throw some light on the first instance where Lisa was not suitably promoted.#Davanti

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Testers: Be more like a Super-Villain!

Who doesn't love a Super Hero? Talk to my son, and he'll tell you how much he loves them, talk to many adults and they'll say the same! Deep down, we all love to be the Super Hero, we all want to save the day! However, I want to talk about the flip side of Super Heroes, the Super Villains... I often play Imaginext with my son, and I (unfortunately?) am nearly always the Super Villain! Be it Lex Luthor, Joker, Two Face, Mr Freeze or The Riddler! These are all great characters and great Super Villains, but why would I want to write about Super Villains? A while ago where I worked, we had a few Super Heroes, people who would be able to come in and "fix" things that had broken and help deliver projects on time. We then shifted, we decided to do away with the Super Hero culture and try and prevent from being in that position in the first place, whilst we didn't go as far as wanting to hire Super Villains, it's definitely a story that has stuck with me and t...

Value in QA Courses/Qualifications?

I have in the past questioned the value in getting certifications/going on courses for the sake of getting a certificate in testing. Whilst I do still question the worth of such an issue, I have recently read some articles which has shown me there is more value in these courses/certificates than I previously gave them credit for. The main positive that I can think of, upon completing a course like an ISEB Foundation, is that it ensures that testers are on the same page when it comes to communicating. A bug is a bug, or if I'm speaking to someone about Integration testing, they know exactly what I am talking about and won't get confused. I think in ensuring that everybody is on the same page when it comes to discussing testing issues/testing activities, it helps in gaining respect and confidence from other teams and other team members, as we are all singing from the same hymn sheet.  It isn't just about communication in the term of words however, it is impor...

Measuring QA Key Skills and Competencies

I have been thinking about how I can help encourage self improvement within my team, as I understand it, everyone wants to improve, it's just that often there are a number of things that hold people back. I believe one of these things that hold people back are around identifying skills that they are perhaps weak in or that they could/should improve on. So I thought about how I can help tackle that problem. One solution that I want to try with people is to identify the key skills for a QA, what key skills should every QA have, or at least what key skills make up a good QA? If I can identify these then I can start helping people identify if they are lacking in an area. Sure there is a competency matrix that we have, but it has things like "An excellent understanding of XXX", it's often very difficult to quantify what an excellent understanding actually is. So I sat down and came up with the following key skills: OOP Test Documentation Manual Testing Automated...