Skip to main content

How to get the testing team together? Part 1 - Hold testing lunches...

Apologies for the lack of blog posts recently, just been very busy and finding it difficult to sit down and actually write something that I feel that people will want to read...

I've been busy mainly at work, but also with home life too, so it hasn't all been work work work...

However, I digress, I have recently taken the initiative to start trying to build a sense of community within the testing team here where I work. I'm trying to do this in a number of ways, one way is the introduction of a Testing Lunch.

What is a Testing Lunch?



A Testing Lunch (I really couldn't think of a better/more catch word... any ideas?) is a lunchtime session where testers voluntarily (and I emphasise that word) come for an hour lunch where we talk about anything to do with testing. This will hopefully lead to the testers genuinely wanting to talk about testing and get discussions going with testers who possibly work on areas that you've not worked on or maybe done some cool test work that someone has been doing that they want to share with others.

I was worried that we'd start them and then have nothing to talk about for a whole hour... but for the first session I asked everyone what they wanted to get out of the session, and we came up with a backlog almost, where if nobody volunteers or has anything they wish to discuss we simply look at the board and pick off the next thing on the backlog.

So far we've covered, Performance Testing in an Agile Way, and I hope that people have taken something away from that.

How to make people attend?

Well this one is easy... Cakes! :) Also I think the fact that it's voluntary (again I emphasise voluntary!) means that people only come if they want to, and so far we've had an average of about 6/7 people turn up which isn't bad considering I'm asking people to give up their lunch, although I'm not sure if it's a willingness to talk about testing that makes them come, or the cakes... Either way, so long as people are talking I don't mind :)

What next for the lunches?

Well I hope that we'll work our way through the backlog and maybe even get other people outside of the testing team to come and do some talking about things that may affect the testing landscape, for instance, mobile apps would be interesting, or our Application Lifecycle Management team could come and we could ask questions about how it all affects testing. It's important however not to cross the divide between Testing and "work", we're talking about Testing as a passion and hobby not as work, so I think it's essential that we don't cross over work into the lunch, as then it just becomes another meeting.

I hope this is something that continues for a long time as I see a lot of value in it, even for welcoming new members of the testing team as we are always welcoming new faces and seeing others go.

What are we talking about?

As I mentioned we have a backlog of items to discuss if needed, this includes (but isn't limited to):

  • Performance Testing in an Agile Way
  • Knowledge sharing across teams
  • What makes a good Agile Tester?
  • How can we improve?
  • Where will testing be in 5 years time?
  • What's the difference between testing and QA?

A lot of the topics above are just to start a debate, I'm interested in learning what the people in the testing team think about the above, as I'm sure there interested to hear what others think as well.

We're currently holding them every week, and people are still attending, so that's a promising sign. :)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Treating Test Code as Production Code

It's important when writing automated tests to remember that the code you write should be up to production standards, meaning any conventions that you have in place should be adhered to and that it should follow good design patterns. Too many people often say why does it have to be as good as production code, it's "Only" a test, so long as it passes then that's fine... To answer this we need to look at why we want our tests to be written in such a structured and efficient manner: - Maintainability - by making the test code structured and efficient, it becomes far easier to maintain and in doing so changes in the future can happen quickly as the test isn't linked to anything that it shouldn't be and it's easy to understand for a new set of eyes. - Durability - Again by making the tests structured they should be resistant to changes, if you change a variable name for instance then it shouldn't effect the unit test unless it absolutely has to....

Testers: Be more like a Super-Villain!

Who doesn't love a Super Hero? Talk to my son, and he'll tell you how much he loves them, talk to many adults and they'll say the same! Deep down, we all love to be the Super Hero, we all want to save the day! However, I want to talk about the flip side of Super Heroes, the Super Villains... I often play Imaginext with my son, and I (unfortunately?) am nearly always the Super Villain! Be it Lex Luthor, Joker, Two Face, Mr Freeze or The Riddler! These are all great characters and great Super Villains, but why would I want to write about Super Villains? A while ago where I worked, we had a few Super Heroes, people who would be able to come in and "fix" things that had broken and help deliver projects on time. We then shifted, we decided to do away with the Super Hero culture and try and prevent from being in that position in the first place, whilst we didn't go as far as wanting to hire Super Villains, it's definitely a story that has stuck with me and t...

Using BDD and gherkinising your Acceptance Tests

In my post Testing of Automated tests , I mention about a BDD framework which involves using BDD to drive your acceptance tests. BDD stands for Behaviour Driven Development.  One effective method of writing BDD tests are by using a format known as Gherkin language. These consist of Given, When, Thens. The main advantage of the gherkin language is that it's readable by the business, and in an ideal world forms part of the Conditions of Acceptance around a PBI. Also, using a Visual Studio plugin of SpecFlow , you can integrate your Gherkinised COAs into your solution with feature files, and then drive the automated tests, however, for this post I will focus solely on how to effectively gherkinise your acceptance tests. A Feature file consists of a feature outline, which details what the feature file is testing followed by Scenarios and examples (parameters).  The BDD scenarios are made up of a Given, When, Then... These are effectively an initial state (Given), an action (W...